[ietf-dkim] Process Question

[Dave Crocker]

Michael Thomas wrote:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
>> As for 5016, you are highlighting one of the problems with calling 
>> such documents "requirements" since slavish adherence to its desires 
>> eliminates any benefits from later insight.
> 
> What you call "slavish", I'd characterize as water under the bridge.

Were mine the only voice raising concerns, that might be appropriate.


> What you seem to be saying is that any single person should be able
> to reopen with no barrier every bit of consensus that was achieved
> in rfc5016. I'd like to hear what the actual barrier ought to be
> from the chairs.

Since I didn't say or mean anything close to your interpretation, I can't 
guess what prompted you to invent it.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net