[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Signature semantics

[Jon Callas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Dec 11, 2007, at 7:23 PM, John Levine wrote:

>> The issue is mandatory end-user identification with i=.
>
> To make it more concrete, can we take this as a proposal to
> change section 2.8 to remove references to the local-part?
>
>

Yes, thank you for being better at being concrete than me.

	Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFHX3ygsTedWZOD3gYRAqAdAKDuVsd5kG2bkVZsIcyC3KuzoZR/EQCeN7ii
u9uvCOYRG4VcROGB0M0ghTM=
=GsLP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----