[ietf-dkim] A whole lotta +/-1

[Stephen Farrell]

Michael Thomas wrote:
> Frank Ellermann wrote:
>> Michael Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see much if any support for changing the valid first party
>>> signature consensus from rfc 5016, and I've
>>> seen a whole lot of -1's.
>>
>> I've seen a bunch of objections against the redefinition
>> of originator (i.e. more than Dave+me+Dave+me+Dave+me ;-)
>>
>> Maybe a poll could help to get a clearer picture of your
>> "a whole lot of" and my "a bunch of".  If the Chairs like
>> the idea, Harald sometimes uses polls, but it's a matter
>> of taste.
> 
> I'm all for that if it puts an(other) end to many of these.

I've no problem with polling on some of the issues, but given
the traffic in recent days, I think we should wait a while to
give folks a chance to catch up with the list.

S.