[ietf-dkim] Processing SSP issues inJanuary using jabber/concalls....

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

Such complaints would naturally be offlist from non or part time
participants at industry meetings, commercial contacts and other venues
Thanks, 


Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:46 PM
To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Processing SSP issues inJanuary using
jabber/concalls....

On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:35, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
> >> Who is the 'everyone' that you are relying on to vet the decision
to do
> >> a variance?
> >
> > I'm assuming the people subscribed here and the ADs.
>
> For a working group that has repeatedly received complaints about
being
> exclusive, it would make sense to be particularly careful to follow
> procedures that encourage participation.  Sufficient advanced notice
seems
> a natural part of that.
>
> d/

I'm not aware of any such complaints.  Would you please provide
references for 
this assertion?

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html