[ietf-dkim] A perspective on what SSP is attempting

[Dave Crocker]

Mike,

Given the existence of thousands of messages in the archive, it won't be much 
effort for you to point me to a thread of them.  The one thing I will ask, 
however, is that it not merely be a reference to the issue, but rather a 
thread in which the perspective is in fact, considered and incorporated into 
the design process.

I ask for the pointer because I'm not aware of such consideration taking place.

d/

Michael Thomas wrote:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
>> Sorry it was not clear that the issue has been that working group 
>> discussion has only been from the perspective you describe and rather 
>> steadfastly 'left out' the one I described.
>>
>> Of course, any reasonable discussion would include both. But that 
>> first requires acknowledging the relevance of both.
> 
> We have acknowledged the relevance of both. This was discussed
> ad nauseum in the thousands of messages about third party vouching,
> added as provisional requirements, ID's written, and ultimately rejected.
> I'm not sure how you could have missed that, but I know that my mind
> was numb for the experience.
> 
>       Mike
>>
>> d/


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net