[ietf-dkim] Re: Discussing what someone said about
SSP - productive?
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Dec 7 07:55:11 PST 2007
Michael Thomas wrote:
>> That mail abuse is such an extreme problem is probably the only reason we
>> would consider such a mechanism, but we need to be careful that we do
>> not use it to entirely disenfranchise possibly legitimate mail senders.
> I assume you know what the meaning of "disenfranchise" is as you've chosen
> to use it twice now. A legitimate user of my domain name is exactly who I
> say is legitimate. There is no vote to be had on that issue, and as such no
> vote to be taken away. Do you seriously dispute that?
Your perspective asserts certainties that we already know do not apply.
My point is exactly that SSP will be operating in a context of significant
uncertainty, yet it's design model really assumes differently.
More information about the ietf-dkim