[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue #1512: Re: making SSP useless in one short step

[John L]

> In that case, what is the SSP result when a message does not contain a
> valid Originator Signature, and the Originator Domain has a policy of "all"?

"not compliant"

> The whole business about third-party signatures is a DKIM-based
> mechanism to decide what to say in that case.  If the verifier sees
> another signature that they "like", the result is "not Suspicious".

If the recipient sees another signature it likes, it's not going to do
an SSP lookup at all, so I don't see any value in giving recipients 
directions for a situation that won't happen.

R's,
John