[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue #1512: Re: making SSP useless in one short step

[Jim Fenton]

John Levine wrote:
>> Which is a long winded version of that third party signatures are
>> completely orthogonal to SSP. "All" should just mean "I sign all of
>> my mail". No more, no less.
>>     
>
> +1
>
> R's,
> John
>
> PS: Mike and I agree on something! Alert the media!
>   

In that case, what is the SSP result when a message does not contain a
valid Originator Signature, and the Originator Domain has a policy of "all"?

The whole business about third-party signatures is a DKIM-based
mechanism to decide what to say in that case.  If the verifier sees
another signature that they "like", the result is "not Suspicious".

-Jim