[ietf-dkim] Draft summary of SSP functionality
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Dec 6 09:43:30 PST 2007
Michael Thomas wrote:
>> To use your example, where 5 declares spam, why is the configuration
>> likely to set STRICT to 4 rather than 10 or 100, given the semantics
>> of Strict?
> Why does this matter? It's an implementation detail. You only asked
> whether people would use SSP that way. The answer is a resounding yes.
What an interesting perspective. The degree of weight that gets used for this
feature is merely an implementation detail, rather than a fundamental test of
the mechanism's utility.
For reference I asked a different question than you chose to hear, but I think
we have sufficiently demonstrated that this exchange cannot be productive.
More information about the ietf-dkim