[ietf-dkim] Tracing SSP's paradigm change

[Dave Crocker]

Michael Thomas wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I seem to have missed the discussion where anyone but you is suprised by
>> this.  If one is going to distinguish between originator signatures and
>> others, then this requirement pretty obviously follows.
> 
> +1, and I had the dubious distinction of having to go through the thousands
> of mail messages. I can't imagine that there is anything new under the sun
> on this topic.


Well, I reviewed the archives for the period during which i= was added and 
could not find discussion of it.  So I'm glad to hear you've done a more 
thorough review.  This means that you can point me to the archives of the 
working group consideration of the issue?

d/


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net