[ietf-dkim] Tracing SSP's paradigm change

[Dave Crocker]

Jim Fenton wrote:
> In the absence of a valid DKIM signature on behalf of the "From" address
> [RFC2822], the verifier of a message MUST determine whether messages from a
> particular sender are expected to be signed, and what signatures are
> acceptable.

What's proving interesting is how completely the implication of this seems to 
have been missed by quite a few participants.

I'l continue to repeat that I haven't found the working group discussion of 
this implication.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net