[ietf-dkim] Review of DKIM Sender Signing
mike at mtcc.com
Tue Dec 4 08:55:07 PST 2007
John Levine wrote:
> In article <47549320.9000307 at dcrocker.net> you write:
>> Review of:
>> DKIM Sender Signing Practices (draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-01)
> Wow, thanks for a very thorough review.
> The biggest problem with this draft is that it goes way beyond
> defining a protocol.
> Part of it describes the way that senders publish statements about
> their sending practices and the way that receivers can look for those
> statements, which is fine, but the rest attempts to tell receivers
> what to do with mail they have received, which is not.
At this point, making sweeping condemnations is pointless. If you want
something in the draft changed, suggest specifics. Better yet: use the
ISSUE mechanism for which Eliot is still paying attention, I believe.
More information about the ietf-dkim