[ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Nov 14 08:03:00 PST 2007
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:23:45 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
> <pbaker at verisign.com> wrote:
>> I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting
> Is this format standardized or does it at least have a stable specification
I think someone posted a link a few messages back.
My question on this is whether it'd really be needed now, as a part
of SSP, or whether it'd be ok to have it as an extension, defined
separately (I'm thinking of the milestones in our charter).
If the latter, then a personal I-D would be the place to start
and the WG can consider that when we see it.
If the former, then I think we need to start by justifying why
the feature is needed but not mentioned in RFC 5016.
More information about the ietf-dkim