[ietf-dkim] Re: t=y

[Steve Atkins]

On Nov 9, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:

>
>
> Bill.Oxley at cox.com wrote:
>> A better question is how many domains will move signing into  
>> production
>> without the testing flag, then fix the inevitable issues.
>
>
> Given that most protocols do not have a 'testing' flag -- and they  
> manage to move into production quite nicely -- a different question  
> might be why such a flag is needed...

Particularly as the failure mode of DKIM is simply to treat the  
message as unsigned - so DKIM failures will not, in any competently  
configured system, affect SMTP interoperability adversely.

Cheers,
   Steve