[ietf-dkim] Re: t=y
SM
sm at resistor.net
Thu Nov 8 21:23:23 PST 2007
Hi Hector,
At 16:45 08-11-2007, Hector Santos wrote:
>My points are clear:
>
>- A testing attribute should used for Migration ideas, by it its
>very natural definition, a testing attribute is limited in scope and time.
Yes. But it's not up to the specifications to define the scope and time.
>- Not having any guidelines on how VERIFIERS will deal with
>perpetual failures, especially those with a testing attribute, is a problem.
Consider the message as unsigned.
>If DKIM is all about "responsibility" and "domain reputation", a
>testing attribute should NOT add to its possible harm.
>
>Therefore, its going to be ignored just like in other similar ideas
>with testing attributs, or the worst case is that it will exploited
>and used to reject mail.
>
>I guess if a DOMAIN addres t=y, then it really doesn't care what is
>the deposition of the message. After all, its only a test.
"t=y" means that the domain is testing DKIM. Some domains can run a
test in a few days and reach a conclusion while others may require
in-depth testing. The sender do care about the disposition of the
message, hence the test.
Regards,
-sm
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list