[ietf-dkim] Nits with section 4 Detailed Description

[Arvel Hathcock]

Understood, thanks for clearing me up on these points!   I'm happy with 
what you said about each point.

Arvel

Jim Fenton wrote:
> Arvel Hathcock wrote:
>   
>> Yet more suggestions:
>>
>> 4.1  DNS Representation
>>
>>      "Sender Signing Practices records" -> "Sender Signing Practices
>> Records" (assuming you agreed to the previous suggestion of making
>> this an explicit definition change in 2.7).
>>