[ietf-dkim] The (really) latest SSP draft
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Oct 18 09:50:15 PDT 2007
On reviewing the current SSP draft, I'm finding myself unclear about the scope
of the document.
So I thought I'd ask a couple of very basic questions:
1. Is the SSP specification intended (or allowed) to modify the
semantics of the DKIM Base specification (RFC 4871)?
I am hoping that folks do *not* intend to change the semantics of the
base specification, since any change will disrupt adoption of the base.
2. Does RFC 4871 contain any claims that a DKIM signature carries a
claim by the signer that any of the body or header content is "correct" or
I ask because I believe it does not carry any such claim and that,
rather, a DKIM signature asserts a very generic degree of signer
"responsibility" which does not extend to formal claims of correctness.
More information about the ietf-dkim