Step 2 (Re: [ietf-dkim] The (really) latest SSP draft)

[Jim Fenton]

Agreed.  Hence the note immediately before the Table of Contents:

> (Unresolved Issues/To Be Done)
>
>    Need to consider handling of multiple responses to a DNS query for
>    the SSP record.

-Jim


Michael Thomas wrote:
> Here you mention that "one or more valid SSP records". In later steps
> (7?)
> you don't subsequently say which record to choose if there is more than
> one. I suppose that the first one is as good as any, but it should at
> least be
> explicit.
>
>       Mike
>