[ietf-dkim] SSP draft suggestions

[Stephen Farrell]

Jim Fenton wrote:

> Yes; thanks for pointing out the repetition.
>> 14) Algorithm 2 - "with one or more answer which is a
>> syntactically-valid SSP response" -> "with one or more syntactically
>> valid SSP responses"
> 
> Right.  This points out that we need to think about what happens if we
> get more than one SSP response.  Any opinions?

Good question. Would simply using the most restrictive be an option?
(Implies a partial order for all SSP statements though, which may
not be true in general.)

S.