Second quarter 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Apr 2 05:43:08 PDT 2007
Ending: Sat Jun 30 08:03:32 PDT 2007
Messages: 423

• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Harald Alvestrand
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Fwd: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot RE: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Zone Files   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Steve Atkins
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Possible extensions for SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jon Callas
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jon Callas
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jon Callas
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements document is done   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] OT: Major spammer arrested   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] IETF 69 DKIM session   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] draft-hutzler-spamops-06   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] rfc 4871 alternate formats   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] latest -overview draft   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] latest -overview draft   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] latest -overview draft   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Dave Crocker
• Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures (fwd)   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Single Organization TXT Lookup with Multiple TXT Records Result   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Damon
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Damon
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Damon
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Damon
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Damon
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Lisa Dusseault
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Lisa Dusseault
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Lisa Dusseault
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] FYI: AOTA presentation   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: draft-hutzler-spamops-06   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Jim's issues - one more try   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Authentication-Results: discussion   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Re: DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   J.D. Falk
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Strawpoll on SSP requirement 5.3.10   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures (fwd)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Stephen Farrell
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Stephen Farrell
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] IETF 69 DKIM session   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-03   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Wildcards and signatures, a moveable feast   Jim Fenton
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Jim Fenton
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Jim Fenton
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Finch
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• MX dot RE: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• MX dot RE: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Wildcards and signatures, a moveable feast   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] FW: draft-hallambaker-xptr-00   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP Policy NOMAIL   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] FW: draft-hallambaker-xptr-00   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] future RFC number for DKIM Signatures   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-05.txt]   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-04.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Authentication-Results: discussion   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   John L
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   John L
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   John L
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Eliot Lear
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] IETF 69 DKIM session   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Fluffy DKIM questions   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures (fwd)   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4870 on Domain-Based Email Authentication Using Public Keys Advertised in the DNS (DomainKeys) (fwd)   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   John Levine
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Charles Lindsey
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Charles Lindsey
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Zone Files   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Charles Lindsey
• Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Keith Moore
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Graham Murray
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Daryl C. W. O'Shea
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Use of XPTR records in SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Upper LeveL Domain   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Domain Lists versus SSP Wildcards   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Domain Lists versus SSP wildcards   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues TXT and no wildcards.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Single Organization TXT Lookup with Multiple TXT Records Result   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Single Organization TXT Lookup with Multiple TXT Records Result   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Wildcard DNS records containing bogus host names to indicate non-support of protocol and DDoS?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] third-party signature & isolating reputations   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Possible extensions for SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Possible extensions for SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Possible extensions for SSP // domain tasting correction   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] FW: draft-hallambaker-xptr-00   Douglas Otis
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Patrick Peterson
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Patrick Peterson
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   SM
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   SM
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Adding SMTP client Requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Single Organization TXT Lookup with Multiple TXT Records Result   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP DOMAIN Discovery Relationship to NO MAIL   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] lets add one more shall we?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Zone Files   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] TXT Subdomain queries   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Zone Files   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Hector Santos
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-03   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard publication   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Michael Thomas
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Re: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Re: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Re: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" != "No mail"   Michael Thomas
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] DNS wildcarding behavior scenarios   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM "blurb"   Wietse Venema
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try   Wietse Venema
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00.txt   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] draft-hutzler-spamops-06   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   william(at)elan.net
• MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Zone Files   william(at)elan.net

Last message date: Sat Jun 30 08:03:32 PDT 2007
Archived on: Sat Jun 30 08:03:31 PDT 2007

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...