[ietf-dkim] Jim's issues - one more try

Hector Santos hsantos at santronics.com
Fri Jun 8 09:58:16 PDT 2007


Douglas Otis wrote:
> 
> On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> 
>> Stephen --
>>
>> This list of yes/no's is not helpful is it quite possible to permute
>> these independent variables and arrive with something that cannot
>> work. What we *really* *really* need is an *exact* proposal that
>> claims to solve this problem so that we can evaluate the alternatives
>> against the Requirements, as well as their other merits. Design by
>> hum here is doomed to fail.
>>
>> My suggestion: require those *fleshed out* proposals to be submitted as
>> ID's so that we can have time to read them, get clarification and
>> consider the tradoffs. Yes, an ID not just one-off wg mailing list
>> handwaving messages.
> 
> +1
> 

+1. Might be a cue to rehash DSAP with the new considerations,

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list