[ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.
hsantos at santronics.com
Wed Jun 6 07:36:05 PDT 2007
Bill.Oxley at cox.com wrote:
> A friend with a small local mail server that ONLY sent out good,
> legitimate mail was blocked by almost everyone for lack of an MX record.
> Old days are gone.
As you saying, that as part as the SSP specification, that it include a
MX requirement and that the LACK of ONE is a new basis for rejection
based on a SSP requirement for SMTP?
Hector Santos, CTO
More information about the ietf-dkim