[ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.

[Hector Santos]

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hector,
> 
> Tomorrow I'll dig through the archive and find the reference
> for where we agreed that the "nomail" requirement text that was
> previously in the ssp-reqs draft would be excised.
> 

I don't recall that at all.   The issue as I recall, and it was 
confusing, was that it would not be part of Phillips's what seem be a 
DOMAIN discovery concept.  I do recall that I debated Phillip on his 
out of scope statements and I recall a confusing response that it wasn't 
what I thought.

But now he just admitted himself that his proposal does have provisions 
to create a slot for it - whatever that means.

I seriously doubt people had a handle of what they were voting on, and I 
wouldn't be surprise if it was a "follow the chieftain" vote taken.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com