[ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of
hsantos at santronics.com
Tue Jun 5 13:52:23 PDT 2007
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Tomorrow I'll dig through the archive and find the reference
> for where we agreed that the "nomail" requirement text that was
> previously in the ssp-reqs draft would be excised.
I don't recall that at all. The issue as I recall, and it was
confusing, was that it would not be part of Phillips's what seem be a
DOMAIN discovery concept. I do recall that I debated Phillip on his
out of scope statements and I recall a confusing response that it wasn't
what I thought.
But now he just admitted himself that his proposal does have provisions
to create a slot for it - whatever that means.
I seriously doubt people had a handle of what they were voting on, and I
wouldn't be surprise if it was a "follow the chieftain" vote taken.
Hector Santos, CTO
More information about the ietf-dkim