[ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of
hsantos at santronics.com
Tue Jun 5 11:47:31 PDT 2007
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> RFC 4405-8.
> Since the requirement is out of scope we are fully within our rights
> to merely note the existence and widespread use of the scheme in
> a non-normative reference.
What does SUBMITTER protocol have to do with with SSP Lookups?
Do you realize that there are still MANY people who are 100% against
using Microsoft's SENDER-ID? or even use SPF?
You can't BASE SSP lookups or Policices on SPF/SENDERID/SUBMITTER
Can we refrain from INTEGRATION ideas here?
DKIM/SSP must WORK as a POST SMTP concept. It can not depend on SMTP
level ideas and you can't depend on RFC 2822 containing the Return-Path.
I don't see how ANY of these other ideas is RELATED to the issue at hand.
- Lookup mechanisms
- Signing Policies
Lets not mix apples and oranges.
Hector Santos, CTO
More information about the ietf-dkim