[ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out of scope.

[Hector Santos]

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> RFC 4405-8.
> 
> Since the requirement is out of scope we are fully within our rights
 > to merely note the existence and widespread use of the scheme in
 > a non-normative reference.

What does SUBMITTER protocol have to do with with SSP Lookups?

Do you realize that there are still MANY people who are 100% against 
using Microsoft's SENDER-ID? or even use SPF?

You can't BASE SSP lookups or Policices on SPF/SENDERID/SUBMITTER

Can we refrain from INTEGRATION ideas here?

DKIM/SSP must WORK as a POST SMTP concept. It can not depend on SMTP 
level ideas and you can't depend on RFC 2822 containing the Return-Path.

I don't see how ANY of these other ideas is RELATED to the issue at hand.

    - Lookup mechanisms
    - Signing Policies

Lets not mix apples and oranges.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com