[ietf-dkim] SSP issues
steve at blighty.com
Sat Jun 2 10:02:08 PDT 2007
On Jun 2, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2007 12:27, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> So if the spec states "SSP clients must query for new RR first, then
>> TXT" you wouldn't expect most receivers to comply with that?
> Eventually, if the new RR type gets some deployment.
The original statement by Arvel (which Hector agreed with) was:
> If we come out with a spec that states "SSP clients must query for
> new RR first, then TXT" senders would be right to expect compliance.
I do not see how this statement can be true for, at least, several
years. Hence my question to Arvel and Hector - is this statement
false, or are they assuming SSP deployment will wait until widespread
adoption of a new RR.
More information about the ietf-dkim