[ietf-dkim] SSP issues
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Wed May 30 15:37:51 PDT 2007
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 18:22, Jim Fenton wrote:
> (2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in discussion,
> mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with anything else."
> Again, no clear consensus.
Agreed. There is also a view that if you go with a new RR type, don't bother
with SSP. By the time a new RR type is widely deployable, the market will
have found a different solution.
More information about the ietf-dkim