[ietf-dkim] SSP issues

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wednesday 30 May 2007 18:22, Jim Fenton wrote:

> (2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in discussion,
> mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with anything else." 
> Again, no clear consensus.

Agreed.  There is also a view that if you go with a new RR type, don't bother 
with SSP.  By the time a new RR type is widely deployable, the market will 
have found a different solution.

Scott K