[ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 on DomainKeys Identified Mail
(DKIM) Signatures (fwd)
Stephen Farrell
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed May 23 08:07:16 PDT 2007
Well congrats and well done to us all!
Now we need to get SSP done.
Stephen.
John Levine wrote:
> The DKIM RFC is finally out. Here's the message posted to ietf-announce.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> From: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Subject: RFC 4871 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 01:58:00 +0000 (UTC)
> Message-ID: <200705230006.l4N06tdi026549 at nit.isi.edu>
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> RFC 4871
>
> Title: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
> Author: E. Allman, J. Callas,
> M. Delany, M. Libbey,
> J. Fenton, M. Thomas
> Status: Standards Track
> Date: May 2007
> Mailbox: eric+dkim at sendmail.org,
> jon at pgp.com,
> markd+dkim at yahoo-inc.com,
> mlibbeymail-mailsig at yahoo.com,
> fenton at cisco.com, mat at cisco.com
> Pages: 71
> Characters: 166054
> Obsoletes: RFC4870
> See-Also:
>
> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dkim-base-10.txt
>
> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4871.txt
>
> DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) defines a domain-level
> authentication framework for email using public-key cryptography and
> key server technology to permit verification of the source and
> contents of messages by either Mail Transfer Agents (MTAs) or Mail
> User Agents (MUAs). The ultimate goal of this framework is to permit
> a signing domain to assert responsibility for a message, thus
> protecting message signer identity and the integrity of the messages
> they convey while retaining the functionality of Internet email as it
> is known today. Protection of email identity may assist in the
> global control of "spam" and "phishing". [STANDARDS TRACK]
>
> This document is a product of the Domain Keys Identified Mail
> Working Group of the IETF.
>
> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
>
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
> suggestions for improvements.Please refer to the current edition of the
> Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization
> state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is
> unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
> Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
> should be sent to IETF-REQUEST at IETF.ORG. Requests to be
> added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
> be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST at RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
>
> Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
> an EMAIL message to rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
>
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
>
> To: rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG
> Subject: getting rfcs
>
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
> Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
> RFC-EDITOR at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
> Authors, for further information.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
> ...
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list