[ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

[Tony Finch]

: <davez at pesystems.com>

On Thu, 17 May 2007, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> Is this construction dangerous if used in inappropriate
> contexts?  Sure.  Does that justify a warning note to the
> unwary?  Probably.  Is it possible to implement other things and
> call them by the same name (i.e., create a non-conforming
> implementation)?  Of course.  Should that invalidate the
> definition?  Not if we want to have anything left if the
> principle were applied broadly.

+1

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
ROCKALL: SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8, INCREASING SEVERE GALE 9, PERHAPS STORM 10
LATER. VERY ROUGH OR HIGH. SHOWERS. GOOD.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf