[ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
dot at dotat.at
Tue May 15 14:54:18 PDT 2007
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Dave Crocker wrote:
> So that is a total of at most 2 documented cases in 10-30 years.
> And keep in mind that the issue is not that the rule "does not work" but that
> it is very rarely mis-used.
Did you miss my post linking to a description of LWSP-related interop
problems in HTTP? http://www.and.org/texts/server-http#implicit-lws
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
FORTH TYNE DOGGER: WEST 4 OR 5, BECOMING VARIABLE 2, THEN SOUTHERLY 3 OR 4.
SLIGHT OR MODERATE. SHOWERS THEN MAINLY FAIR. GOOD OCCASIONALLY MODERATE AT
More information about the ietf-dkim