[ietf-dkim] Re: LWSP in base64-encoded public key TXT RR
paul.hoffman at domain-assurance.org
Wed Mar 7 11:41:19 PST 2007
At 7:09 PM +0100 3/7/07, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> maybe Eric could still do a s/LWSP/[FWS]/g in AUTH48
>>> eliminating LWSP everywhere (?)
>> Absolutely not. This is a technical change.
>It's IMO more in the direction of an erratum. Nobody
>could claim with a straight face that they need lines
>consisting only of white space for their folding magic.
Even if true, it is still a technical change. dkim-base is a standard
*today*, even before the RFC is issued. Implementations of *the
standard* have already been deployed. You are proposing a change to
the way an implementation needs to act.
> > If we tried that, the document would have to go through
>> IESG review again.
>I thought that this depends on the AD or the shepherd (?)
It is up to the RFC Editor.
>Of course I don't want a new IESG review or other delays.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Domain Assurance Council
More information about the ietf-dkim