[ietf-dkim] Re: LWSP in base64-encoded public key TXT RR
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Wed Mar 7 10:09:19 PST 2007
Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> maybe Eric could still do a s/LWSP/[FWS]/g in AUTH48
>> eliminating LWSP everywhere (?)
> Absolutely not. This is a technical change.
It's IMO more in the direction of an erratum. Nobody
could claim with a straight face that they need lines
consisting only of white space for their folding magic.
> If we tried that, the document would have to go through
> IESG review again.
I thought that this depends on the AD or the shepherd (?)
Of course I don't want a new IESG review or other delays.
More information about the ietf-dkim