[ietf-dkim] Re: LWSP in base64-encoded public key TXT RR

[Paul Hoffman]

At 12:34 PM +0100 3/7/07, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>But it also uses the 4234 <LWSP> in (2.4), sigh.  It's IMO a
>bit late to address your concern, but maybe Eric could still
>do a s/LWSP/[FWS]/g in AUTH48 eliminating LWSP everywhere (?)

Absolutely not. This is a technical change. If we tried that, the 
document would have to go through IESG review again.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Domain Assurance Council