[ietf-dkim] Today's jabber notes...

Michael Thomas mike at mtcc.com
Fri Mar 2 14:15:05 PST 2007


We can close 1399 too.

This leaves 1382 as the only one that we haven't discussed to my
knowledge.

Also: since I still haven't heard anything about whether anybody cares
about the local part stuff, I'm going to nuke it unless there is a huge 
uproar.

       Mike

Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> This mail is for Eliot's benefit so he can officially close
> stuff in the tracker.
>
> Eliot the "       - CLOSE" bits are the ones you want
>
> 1356, 1357, 1362, 1363: Mike to check with Dave Crocker that
>       these can now be safely CLOSED.
>         - CLOSE
> 1360: CLOSED barring list objections
>         - CLOSE
> 1364: Mike to check with Dave again, thinks this can be CLOSED.
>         - CLOSE
> 1365: Eric to check on list if we have consensus to drop 5.3 
> requirement 2,
>         - CLOSE
> 1383: CLOSED - we decided that in San Diego
>         - CLOSE
> 1386: Not clear what the requirement is - Mike to mail PHB asking for
>       clarification
>         - CLOSE - PHB's suggested text to be included in -03 & poll WG
>           thereafter
> 1398: Eric to raise this on the list - want clarification from Frank
>     - CLOSE (?)
> 1399: Mike to add a requirement like "the protocol MUST be crystal
>       clear as to when SSP must be invoked" and then CLOSE this
>     - TBD so still OPEN
> 1402: Stephen to raise on the list & add to Prague agenda
>     - OPEN
> 1408: Jabberers wanted to CLOSE this one with no change
>     - CLOSE
>
> There's been a lot of list traffic recently so if folks could
> check I've not made a mistake there that'd be good.
>
> Stephen.
>
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> ..attached. Please check to see if something you care about
>> was discussed since there weren't enough people present
>> to be confident of rough consensus.
>>
>> Stephen.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list