[ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no
hsantos at santronics.com
Thu Mar 1 18:24:19 PST 2007
Steve Atkins wrote:
>> This POLICY and among others have been part of the design
>> discussions/debates process since the beginning with the original SSP
>> specs, the current SSP specs including my own DSAP and most
>> importantly, it being already MODELED in published DKIM/SSP open
>> source software.
> It's been out of scope since day one. The argument for keeping it has
> been "Yeah, it's out of scope, but what the hell, we're throwing stuff
> that's far less useful into the pile of stuff. At least this one piece
> has some conceivable real world use, lets keep it."
Look, maybe I'm not privy to your "inner circle" and frankly I don't
care, but what I do care is how YOUR decisions might effect our product
The SSP drafts, both OLD and NEW, all had "NO MAIL" considerations, so I
have no clue what what you are talking about it being "OUT OF SCOPE"
with some behind the scene whispers.
More information about the ietf-dkim