[ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no

[Hector Santos]

Steve Atkins wrote:
> 

>> This POLICY and among others have been part of the design 
>> discussions/debates process since the beginning with the original SSP 
>> specs, the current SSP specs including my own DSAP and most 
>> importantly, it being already MODELED in published DKIM/SSP open 
>> source software.
> 
> It's been out of scope since day one. The argument for keeping it has 
> been "Yeah, it's out of scope, but what the hell, we're throwing stuff 
> that's far less useful into the pile of stuff. At least this one piece 
> has some conceivable real world use, lets keep it."

Huh?

Look, maybe I'm not privy to your "inner circle" and frankly I don't 
care, but what I do care is how YOUR decisions might effect our product 
line.

The SSP drafts, both OLD and NEW, all had "NO MAIL" considerations, so I 
have no clue what what you are talking about it being "OUT OF SCOPE" 
with some behind the scene whispers.

---
HLS