[ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no

[Hallam-Baker, Phillip]

> [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Arvel Hathcock

> I have had some sympathy for this in the past but now I have 
> to ask: Are we creating "Sender *SIGNING* Practices" or 
> "Sender Practices In General"?  Besides, there are already at 
> least two other ways with more traction to achieve this 
> particular goal.

This is a subtly different issue.

The charter only allows us to actualy specify "Sender *SIGNING* Practices" but that does not mean that we can't provide a framework that is capable of expressing "Sender Practices In General".

My position is that we should not address this until after we recharter.