[ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :

Mark Delany markd+dkim at yahoo-inc.com
Mon Feb 26 09:30:27 PST 2007


Michael Thomas wrote:
>> been deprecated.  To permit a graceful transition, both the deprecated 
>> algorithm (whatever that might be) and some shiny new algorithm must 
>> now be included with the message.  Once your verifier adopts the shiny 

[ Two valid signatures in the message ]

Wasn't this always the transition plan? The only crucial point is that 
the Selector associated with the "weaker" signature has to tell the 
verifier to expect the presence of "stronger" signature.

If the verifier doesn't understand the "stronger/newer" signature or 
can't find it, then it has a risk decision to make about the weaker 
verification. Selector-embedded SSP could give guidance to local policy 
here.


> At least I can see the potential issue here.

With the solution or the problem?


Mark.



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list