[ietf-dkim] Today's jabber notes...

Bill.Oxley at cox.com Bill.Oxley at cox.com
Fri Feb 23 06:13:16 PST 2007


"1399: Mike to add a requirement like "the protocol MUST be crystal 
      clear as to when SSP must be invoked" and then CLOSE this"

I may implement check SSP 1st to see if their policy signs or not
I may not use SSP at all
And of course I may check SSP every time I have a DKIM signed message.
Clear as mud
thanks

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:26 PM
To: ietf-dkim
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Today's jabber notes...


..attached. Please check to see if something you care about
was discussed since there weren't enough people present
to be confident of rough consensus.

Stephen.





More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list