[ietf-dkim] Re: Policy

[Stephen Farrell]

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> I think that there is plenty on policy to keep us busy.

I agree, but list members are being uncharacteristically
shy on the topic recently;-)

> I see three (related) questions:

Should those be addressed in ssp-reqs? If so, (and they're
not currently), then how?

We agreed in San Diego to finalise ssp-reqs first (via a
WGLC) before deciding SSP protocol issues, but we've made
no progress recently (to be fair, a number of folks were
busy with dealing with IESG comments to base, so its not
a criticism, just a fact). I'd like us to have that WGLC
started around Prague if we can.

Stephen.