[ietf-dkim] Re: Policy
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Feb 21 12:54:28 PST 2007
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> I think that there is plenty on policy to keep us busy.
I agree, but list members are being uncharacteristically
shy on the topic recently;-)
> I see three (related) questions:
Should those be addressed in ssp-reqs? If so, (and they're
not currently), then how?
We agreed in San Diego to finalise ssp-reqs first (via a
WGLC) before deciding SSP protocol issues, but we've made
no progress recently (to be fair, a number of folks were
busy with dealing with IESG comments to base, so its not
a criticism, just a fact). I'd like us to have that WGLC
started around Prague if we can.
More information about the ietf-dkim