[ietf-dkim] Configuring "unacceptable" domains

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

Doug,
Are you suggesting a methodology should be applied to a form of
blacklist that DKIM would/should reject?
Thanks,

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:29 PM
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: Barry Leiba; IETF DKIM WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Configuring "unacceptable" domains


On Feb 21, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

>
>
> Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> The DKIM base draft has been updated and submitted.  The changes  
>>> are minimal, comprising response to IESG review and some XML  
>>> updates intended to smooth the rfc-editor review.
>> And the -base-10 draft is now on its way to the RFC editor queue, 
>> [1] having passed IESG review.  Many thanks to everyone who worked  
>> to get this done.  And now we just wait for the RFC editor  
>> process, and the RFC number for the Proposed Standard.
>
> And get active on SSP again. (Or should I cancel the Prague meeting  
> slot? So far we've little to discuss it seems.)

Devote some time resolving how DKIM verifiers should configure  
"unlikely" or "unacceptable" domains.  Is there a recommended format  
for the list?  Perhaps this list could be called the Minimal Domain  
Depth (MDD) or something.  Should this list preclude known second and  
third level domains, or just TLDs?  Should this list be handled by  
IANA?  If so, there should be a corresponding draft.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html