[ietf-dkim] Milestone dates....
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Feb 14 07:40:44 PST 2007
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 06:57, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> As discussed in San Diego we need to revisit our milestone
>> dates. I suggest the following:
>> And that we progress the ssp-reqs to be an informational
> As one of those who weren't there, I'd appreciate it if you could provide some
> information on the rationale for this change. From what little I know of the
> IETF process, I'd have expected it to change to experimental if it was goint
> to change....
Bit of confusion here maybe. We're talking about SSP-reqs being
informational (it doesn't exist in our current charter) but no
change to the goal of a standards track SSP protocol.
We're not currently envisaging any experimental RFCs from this
More information about the ietf-dkim