[ietf-dkim] The DKIM WG is within security?

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

Doug,
replacement values
*********************************
G) Annotation?

Annotation must take place at the MUA or signatures are invalidated.  It
seems MTA vendors wish to retain DKIM completely within their baliwick.
Without the effort joined by MUA and web client (browser extensions)
vendors, DKIM is likely to increase phishing success rates.
**********************************

with

>G) Annotation?

Annotation should take place at the MUA or entity with access to the addressbook or signatures should not be annotated. Without the effort joined by MUA and web client (browser extensions) vendors, DKIM is not likely to increase phishing catch rates.
thanx,
bill