[ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?

[Jon Callas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Maybe we want "RFC only", not "standards track only", particularly  
> so that people can create Experimental RFCs and have them be used  
> in an interoperable fashion as a way of determining whether they  
> should later be elevated to standards track.

Good reasoning. I also concur.

	Jon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.5.2
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFFt8/wsTedWZOD3gYRArxMAJ9ydijTylFCICkdyf5XQ+53R6jTRACfWllD
oZuJ4JxQ7t4KZzpg/2SzdBY=
=9Rq1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----