[ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt

[Frank Ellermann]

Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:

>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt

Observations in addition to "example.edu":

- [RFC-DK]  Is that ready for publication ?  I don't get
  what the I-D tracker page actually says, is it approved ?

- 8.1.1 s/displaying MTA/displaying MUA/

- 7.9 
  s/Permanent Header Messages/Permanent Header Fields [RFC 3864]/
  and add [RFC 3864] to the informative references, see also
  <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.message-headers/33>

- 7
  s/Standards Track RFCs/any published RFCs/  Otherwise the
  following sections make no sense.  The clause "approved by
  the IESG" should be removed.  The RFC-editor is obliged to
  ask the IESG for comments in the case of any "independent"
  submissions. 

- 6.3
  "SHOULD NOT reject" because that "could cause severe  
  interoperability problems" is plain nonsense.  Accepting
  mail tagged as "suspicious" will cause severe problems 
  because tagged mail will be most likely deleted without
  further checks later.  OTOH "reject" is a clean decision
  at the border MX.

Frank