[ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Fri Jan 19 18:59:33 PST 2007
Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
> Filename : draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt
Observations in addition to "example.edu":
- [RFC-DK] Is that ready for publication ? I don't get
what the I-D tracker page actually says, is it approved ?
- 8.1.1 s/displaying MTA/displaying MUA/
s/Permanent Header Messages/Permanent Header Fields [RFC 3864]/
and add [RFC 3864] to the informative references, see also
s/Standards Track RFCs/any published RFCs/ Otherwise the
following sections make no sense. The clause "approved by
the IESG" should be removed. The RFC-editor is obliged to
ask the IESG for comments in the case of any "independent"
"SHOULD NOT reject" because that "could cause severe
interoperability problems" is plain nonsense. Accepting
mail tagged as "suspicious" will cause severe problems
because tagged mail will be most likely deleted without
further checks later. OTOH "reject" is a clean decision
at the border MX.
More information about the ietf-dkim