[ietf-dkim] basic question

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:18:32 -0800 Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org> 
wrote:
>
>DKIM's restrictions on linking signatures with a header was premised  
>upon an expectation that visual examination of headers provided a  
>means for recognition.   

Would you please point me to a reference for this statement?  

I recall saying 2822.From should be signed because it's a mandatory element 
of an e-mail message.  You seem to remember a different WG discussion than 
I do.

Scott K