[Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim]

[Michael Thomas]

Mark Delany wrote:
> Michael Thomas wrote:
>> Yes. In my mind there's a substantial difference in clarifying an 
>> edge condition
>
> Last call is intended to find bugs. We found a bug, let's fix it.

Last call ended 4 months ago.

> I don't think the "lateness" has anything to do with it since there 
> are bugs in either direction and no one even noticed until recently. 
> It can hardly be the case that it is breaking much to apply the fix.

Well, we have a deployment and changing this from the current sense would be
breaking messages that would have otherwise survived. That is what I 
recently
discovered. Do you have evidence to the contrary with your DKIM deployment?

       Mike

>
>
> Mark.