[Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim]

[Tony Hansen]

And that's where the contention comes in.

I firmly believe that what you write below is what we *intended*.
However, it is *not* what is described in the current spec.

	Tony Hansen
	tony at att.com

Mark Delany wrote:
>>> (Did you mean to include Last-Header: in the following examples?)
> 
> Sure. In which case the answer is that the canonicalized output of 2-5
> should be:
> 
> -----------------------
> -----------------------