[ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed messages

[Steve Atkins]

On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:

> Steve Atkins wrote:
>
>> There seems to be some belief that if SSP does exactly the
>> same thing as SPF then we'll pull the phishing-proof, spam-
>> resistant mail architecture out of the hat this time.
>
> A lousy chance based on PRA (SenderID).  Zero chance based on
> 2822-From, the concept makes no sense, it's incompatible with
> tons of special cases with PRA != 2822-From.

So, to summarize, you believe that SSP is drastically less likely
to provide any operational benefit or achieve widespread
deployment than SPF?

Cheers,
   Steve