[ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements

[Dave Crocker]

old news, but i'm trying to catch up.

Steve Atkins wrote:
> While I strongly agree with this interpretation of dkim-base,
> some have argued that there are three states
> in dkim-base: signature verification suceeds, signature
> verification fails and "no signature".

Since -base explicitly direct a failure as being equivalent to no signature, 
that leaves a total of 2 states:

1. GoodSig
2. NoSig

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net