[ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements
dcrocker at bbiw.net
Sat Dec 9 12:41:15 PST 2006
old news, but i'm trying to catch up.
Steve Atkins wrote:
> While I strongly agree with this interpretation of dkim-base,
> some have argued that there are three states
> in dkim-base: signature verification suceeds, signature
> verification fails and "no signature".
Since -base explicitly direct a failure as being equivalent to no signature,
that leaves a total of 2 states:
More information about the ietf-dkim