[ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain

[Steve Atkins]

On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:39 AM, John Levine wrote:

>> That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people  
>> still
>> discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as
>> possible signing domains.
>>
>> OK, this is a petition for reopening this Issue.
>
> -1
>
> It's a feature that the signing domain isn't tied to other headers,
> not a bug.

Agreed.

Cheers,
   Steve