[ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required

[Stephen Farrell]

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
>> this is issue#1398 now btw, so we'll be coming back to decide it
> 
> Yes, we got the same mail with the ticket number from Eliot.  What
> about two minor points in this thread:
> 
> 1 - Is the "sender" in 4.1 4th paragraph actually an "author" ?
> 2 - What exactly happens with Alice's SSP in scenario 5.3 ?
> 
> Should that also get new tickets, or is it obvious / irrelevant ?

They sound sufficiently like new tickets that we might bother
Eliot again:-)

S.